Unit 4: Dividend Relevance
Dividend Relevance
Dividend relevance theory suggests that dividends affect the value of a firm and hence are important for shareholders and investors.
Supported by
- Walter’s Model
- Gordon’s Model
These models argue that investors prefer current dividends over future capital gains, especially if the company’s return on investment is high.
🧭 Factors Affecting Dividend Policy
Dividend policy = Company’s decision on how much profit to distribute as dividends and how much to retain for reinvestment.
🔑 Key Factors
Forms of Dividends
Companies can distribute profits in various forms:
- In Short, Dividend relevance theories suggest that dividend policy impacts firm value and investor perception.
- The right dividend policy balances shareholder satisfaction and future growth.
- Companies choose different forms of dividends based on cash availability, financial health, and strategic goals.
Types of Dividend Policies
Dividend Policy refers to the strategy a company follows in deciding how much of its profits to distribute as dividends and how much to retain for reinvestment.
1. Stable Dividend Policy
The company pays a fixed and regular dividend every year, regardless of fluctuations in profits.
🔹 Features
- May increase gradually over time.
- Provides confidence to investors.
- Maintains consistency.
🔹 Types
- Constant Dividend per Share
- Constant Payout Ratio
- Stable Rupee Dividend Plus Extra Dividend
✔️ Suitable for: Companies with stable and predictable earnings.
2. Constant Dividend Payout Ratio Policy
The company pays a fixed percentage of its earnings as dividend.
Example: If payout ratio = 40%, and earnings = ₹10 lakhs → Dividend = ₹4 lakhs
Features
- Dividend changes as profits change.
- Fluctuating income for shareholders.
✔️ Suitable for: Firms with fluctuating profits or growth-stage firms.
3. Residual Dividend Policy
Company pays dividends only after meeting its capital investment needs.
🔹 Features
- Priority to funding business growth.
- Dividend is residual = Profit – Retained earnings for investments.
✔️ Suitable for: Firms with many growth opportunities and need to reinvest profits.
4. No Dividend Policy
Company does not pay any dividend and retains all profits for reinvestment.
🔹 Features
- Focus on internal financing.
- May be due to low profits, expansion needs, or early business stage.
✔️ Suitable for: Startups or new businesses with high reinvestment requirements.
🧾 Comparison Table
- In Short, Dividend policy depends on profit stability, growth needs, investor expectations, and financial goals.
- Stable dividend policy is most preferred by investors.
- Residual policy focuses on maximizing internal growth
Walter’s Model (Dividend Relevance Theory)
🔹 Proposed by: Prof. James E. Walter
📌 Assumption: Dividends affect the value of the firm. The choice between dividend payout vs. reinvestment depends on the firm’s return (r) and cost of capital (k).
📐 Formula:
Where:
- P = Price of the share
- D = Dividend per share
- E = Earnings per share
- r = Internal rate of return
- k = Cost of capital
🔍 Implications:
Gordon’s Model (Bird-in-Hand Theory)
🔹 Proposed by: Myron Gordon
📌 Assumption: Investors prefer certain (current) dividends over uncertain (future) capital gains.
📐 Formula:
Where:
- P = Price of share
- E = Earnings per share
- b = Retention ratio
- r = Rate of return on reinvested earnings
- ke = Cost of equity
🔍 Implications
Miller and Modigliani (MM) Hypothesis (Dividend Irrelevance Theory)
🔹 Proposed by: Franco Modigliani & Merton Miller
📌 Assumption: Dividend policy has no effect on firm value or shareholders' wealth under ideal market conditions.
🧠 Key Assumptions:
- Perfect capital market
- No taxes or transaction costs
- No flotation costs
- Investors behave rationally
- Investment decisions are fixed
🧾 Explanation: According to MM, investors are indifferent between dividends and capital gains. The value of the firm depends only on its earning power and investment decisions, not on dividend decisions.
📐 Formula:
Where:
- 𝑃0 = Current market price of share
- 𝐷1= Dividend at end of year
- 𝑃1 = Price of share at end of year
- 𝑘𝑒 = Cost of equity
🔍 Comparison Table
Dividend Irrelevance Theory
🔹 Proposed by: Modigliani and Miller (MM)
📌 Core Idea: Dividend policy does NOT affect the value of the firm or shareholder wealth in a perfect market.
🧠 Assumptions:
- Perfect capital markets (no taxes, no transaction costs).
- Investors behave rationally.
- Investment decisions are fixed.
- No flotation cost or risk differences.
🔍 Explanation: Investors can create their own “dividend” by selling shares if they want cash. So whether a company pays dividends or reinvests profits, it doesn't impact the firm’s value.
🎯 Conclusion: Dividend policy is irrelevant in determining the market value of a firm.
Bird-in-Hand Theory
🔹 Proposed by: Myron Gordon & John Lintner
📌 Core Idea: Investors prefer current (certain) dividends over future (uncertain) capital gains.
🔍 Explanation: A “bird in hand” (current dividend) is better than “two in the bush” (future profits).
- Investors see future earnings as risky.
- So, firms that pay higher dividends are valued higher.
🎯 Conclusion: Dividend policy is relevant and higher dividends increase firm value.
Tax Preference Theory
🔹 Proposed by: R.H. Litzenberger & K. Ramaswamy
📌 Core Idea: Investors prefer capital gains over dividends due to lower tax rates on capital gains.
🔍 Explanation:
- Dividends are taxed as regular income.
- Capital gains are taxed later (and sometimes at a lower rate).
- Investors prefer firms that retain earnings and increase share price.
🎯 Conclusion:
- Low or no dividend payout is preferred by investors to minimize taxes.